If there was any need to still provide evidence
how mainstream Apple products have become, it cannot
get more obvious than at our neighbourhood Walmart,
where I go for groceries three times a week, and which
has recently become an Apple Authorized Reseller,
a fact they proudly advertise on a banner hoisted
above the little section where you can play with
the goods (if by goods
you mean iPads, you will
have to compete with a constant number of kids
that hang around the three hands-on devices).
As you know, reluctance to buy something
that is essentially two years old now has prevented
me to get my replacement iPod, but those retina displays
sure are a temptation and hardware updates have been
substituted by price cuts, too. So I try to stay
away from this part of the shop.
One interesting thing about the gadgets on display
is that they (like their siblings across the globe)
prominently feature a Youtube app, which is completely
non-functional here in China (at least out-of-the-box). I find this interesting
because normally Apple is very keen on making sure
everything works on their devices, either by making
it work on their devices, or by kicking it off their devices,
and because in this case it is not clear how they would
do that. As far as I can tell, iOS devices are completely
identical across the world, and Apple has made it a point
to not let anyone (such as phone companies) get between
them and the end-user. (NB: There are apparently camera-less
iPhones in Singapore, so that military personal can buy them).
Removing the pre-installed Youtube app world-wide does not
seem like a good option (but still something Apple if anyone
would do at a whim, especially to spite Google, the relationship
with which has soured considerably since the iPhone made its
debut). Having a special China edition would draw criticism
about censorship, ironically along the same lines that Google
faced when they removed search results to improve the user-experience
by not showing links that would be blocked anyway.
I also find it interesting because it showcases China's
approach to Internet censorship, which is plain pragmatic.
One might argue that they would be keen on suppressing knowledge
that Youtube (and Facebook and Twitter) even existed, and be unhappy
about a Youtube app on a phone sold here. But it seems that
they do not care that the "1%" have their ways to unfettered Internet
access (or even acknowledge the fact that they need it to
keep the economy functioning), as long as they can control media access for the vast
majority of the population. The enormous and growing
income gap between the rich and the poor in China has
become the most urgent problem for the government here,
and they claim to be taking steps to address it,
if only to maintain their own grip on power.
I wonder if a fairer distribution of wealth will need to
coincide in less restrictive access to
media (both in the traditional broadcast sense and of the
user-generated variety).
Along the same lines, you see a lot of Mark Zuckerberg
on the covers of business magazines here these days. Everything
Mark Zuckerberg does is blocked in China. I do not know what stance Facebook
has towards China, it seems that they have not felt the need to
make concessions to get allowed in, and I congratulate them for it.
Pulling out of China must have been a hard thing for Google to do, and I hope
that after their IPO, Facebook does not feel the pressure to make
more money by expanding its presence here (especially after having signed up everyone else in the rest of the world).